Achievement Gap
Nationwide and statewide standardized tests and dropout rate statistics show a troubling and pervasive achievement gap between groups of students by race, ethnicity and socioeconomic status. White students typically tend to exhibit higher achievement than African-American, Native American, and Latino students, as well as some subgroups of Asian-American students and recent immigrants.
The achievement gap is unconscionable and spells disaster for our state's long-term competitiveness. While policymakers have devoted more resources to boost academic achievement, but much more needs to be done to eliminate the achievement gap.
Race and Ethnicity
In 10th grade, White and Asian students perform higher on the writing by 14.9 percentage points and reading by 16.2 percentage points sections of the WASL compared to other racial and ethnic groups of students. Larger gaps in achievement between students are present in math (25 percentage points) and science (24.1 percentage points).

Source: OSPI
Socioeconomic Status
An achievement gap also exists between students in different socioeconomic groups. In reading, students from low income households perform between 18 and 23.7 percentage points lower on the WASL. In math, low-income students tend to score 28.3 to 29.7 percentage points lower than their peers. In science, the gap ranges from 25.2 to 29.9 percentage points.

Drop-out Rates
Significant differences exist between the dropout rates of each racial/ethnic group. Class of 2005 cohort dropout rates for African-American, Latino and Native American students were 8.5 to 23.4 percentage points higher than for White and Asian students.

Source: OSPI
Resources
Office of the Superintendent of Public Instruction
- Advisory Committee for African American Achievement Gap
- Washington State Report Card
- Graduation and Dropout Statistics for Washington's Counties, Districts, and Schools
- Education Watch: Washington, Fall 2006
- African American Achievement in America
- Latino Achievement in America
- P. Barton. Parsing the Achievement Gap: Baselines for Tracking Progress, October 2003.
- I. Kirsch, et al. America's Perfect Storm: Three Forces Changing Our Nation's Future, January 2007.
Achievement Gap Initiative at Harvard University
Other Research
- C. Clotfelter, et al. The Academic Achievement Gap in Grades 3 to 8, April 2006 (working paper).
- E. Hanushek & S. Rivkin. School Quality and the Black-White Achievement Gap, June 2006.
- L. Page, R. Murnane & J. Willett. Understanding Trends in the Black-White Achievement Gap: The Importance of Decomposition Methodology. March 2008.
- S. Reardon. Differential Growth in the Black-White Achievement Gap During Elementary School Among Initially High- and Low-Scoring Students. March 2008.
- R. Rothstein & T. Wilder. The Many Dimensions of Racial Inequality, October 2005 (working paper).
